|
課程名稱 |
社會學研究方法
Sociological Research Methods |
|
開課學期 |
107-2 |
|
授課對象 |
社會科學院 社會學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
林國明 |
|
課號 |
Soc7016 |
|
課程識別碼 |
325 M9990 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
必修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期三2,3,4(9:10~12:10) |
|
上課地點 |
社318 |
|
備註 |
本系碩士班一年級必修。,含學術倫理 不當研究行為1. 0小時 學術寫作技巧1. 0小時 受試者保護2. 0小時
限本系所學生(含輔系、雙修生) 且 限碩士班以上
總人數上限：15人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1072Soc7016_ |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
待補 |
|
課程目標 |
待補 |
|
課程要求 |
待補 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
單元主題與可能的閱讀（暫訂）
1. 社會學方法的多重典範
Stinchcombe, Arthur. 1968. “The Logic of Scientific Inference.” Pp. 15-37 in Constructing Social Theories. Harcourt Brace and World.
Lieberson, S., & Lynn, F. B. (2002). Barking up the wrongbranch: Scientific alternatives to the current model of sociological science. Annual Review of Sociology, 1-19
Alford, Robert. 王志弘譯，2011, 好研究怎麼做，台北：群學，頁87-119
2. 多元方法的結合
Small, Mario. 2011. “How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature.” Annual Review of Sociology 37:57-86.
Alise, Mark, A., and Charles Teddlie. 2010. “A Continuation of the Paradigm Wars? Prevalence Rates of Methodological Approaches Across the Social/Behavioral Sciences.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4: 103-26.
林國明，2016，誰來審議?台灣民眾對審議民主的支持和參與意 願，台灣社會學，31:43-97
3. 研究問題
Booth, Wayne, Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams. 2003. The Craft of Research. University of Chicago press. (Highly recommend that you read/skim entire book)
4. 文獻回顧
Becker, Howard S. 1986. “Terrorized by the Literature.” Pp. 135-149 in Writing for Social Scientists: How to Start and Finish Your Thesis, Book, or Article. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clemens, Elizabeth, Walter W. Powell, Kris McIlwaine, and Dina Okamato. 1995. “Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations.” American Journal of Sociology 101 (2): 433-494.
Hargens, Lowell. 2000. “Using the Literature: Reference Networks, Reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship.” American Sociological Review 65 (6): 846-865.
5. 理論建構與檢定
Sutton, Robert and Barry Staw. 1995. “What Theory is Not.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (3): 371-384.
DiMaggio, Paul. 1995. “Comments on ‘What Theory is Not.’” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (3): 391-397.
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 2012 (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chapters 1 & 2 (“The Discovery of Grounded Theory” and “Generating Theory.”)
Suddaby, Roy. 2006. “What Grounded Theory is Not.” The Academy of Management Journal. 49 (4): 633-642.
Coleman, James. 1991. “Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action.” American Journal of Sociology 1991 (60): 1309-1335.
6. 相關、因果關係與因果機制（指定閱讀未定）
Abbott, Andrew. 2004. Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. New York: W.W. Norton. Chapters 1-2.
Miller, Jane E. 2005. Writing About Multivariate Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Chapters 3-4
Winship, Christopher and Stephen L. Morgan. 1999. “The Estimation of Causal Effects from Observational Data.” Annual Review of Sociology 25:659-707.
Strauss, Anselm. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pages 249-264, Chapter 12. (on how to present a causal argument in writing).
Mahoney, James. 2000. "Strategies of Causal Inference in Small-N Analysis," Sociological Methods and Research 28(4): 387-424.
Morgan, Stephen L and Christopher Winship. 2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 1 only)
McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2008. “Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention.” Qualitative Sociology 31: 307-331.
Hedstrom, Peter and Richard Swedberg. 1998. “Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay.” Pp. 1-31 in Social Mechanisms, edited by Peter Hedstrom and Richard Swedberg. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
7. 概念與測量
Miller, Jane E. 2005. Writing About Multivariate Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Chs.1-2
Schutt, Russell K. 2011. Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research. 7th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Ch2, 4, 6.
8. 抽樣與個案選擇（指定閱讀未定）
* 一般與機率抽樣
Becker, Howard S. 1998. “Sampling.” Chapter 3 (pp. 67-108) in Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While you’re Doing It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Schutt, Russell K. 2015. “Sampling and Generalizability.” Chapter five in Investigating the Social World, Eighth Edition.
Fowler, Floyd J. 2002. Survey Research Methods, 3rd Edition. Sage. Chapter 2.
Winship, Christopher and Robert D. Mare. 1992. “Models for Sample Selection Bias.” Annual Review of Sociology 18: 327-50.
Rossi, Peter. 1988. “On Sociological Data.” Pp. 131-154 in Handbook of Sociology. Edited by Neil Smelser. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
*質化研究的抽樣與個案選擇
Small, Mario Luis. 2009. “‘How Many Cases Do I Need?’: On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field Based Research.” Ethnography. 10: 5-38.
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., and Spiers, J. (2008). “Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22.
Weiss, Robert S. 1994. “Respondents: Choosing Them and Recruiting Them.” Chapter 2 (pp 15-37) in Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: The Free Press.
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 2012 (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chapters 1 & 2 (“The Discovery of Grounded Theory” and “Generating Theory.”)
Mahoney, James and Gary Goertz. 2004. "The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Qualitative Research," American Political Science Review 98:4
Ragin, Charles and Howard Becker (eds). 1992. What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge University Press. Selecttions.
Miles, Matthew B. and A. Michale Huberman. 1994. “Sampling: Bounding the Collection of Data.” Pp. 27-34 in Qualitative Data Analysis. An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Edition) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Burawoy, Michael. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16(1): 4- 33.
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications. Chapters 1 and 2.
9. 參與觀察與民族誌
Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz and Linda L. Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Read Chapters 2-6, skim 1, 7 and 8.
Becker, Howard S. 2001. “The Epistemology of Qualitative Research.” Pages 317-330 in Contemporary Field Research, second edition. Robert M. Emerson, editor. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
10. 訪談與問卷調查
Weiss, Robert. 1995. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press. Read Chapters 1, 3-6; skim 2, 7.
Fink, Arlene and Jacqueline Kosecoff. 2005. How to Conduct Surveys (3rd edition). Sage Publications. Read Chapters 1-3.
Schaeffer, Nora Cate and Stanley Presser. 2003. “The Science of Asking Questions.” Annual Review of Sociology 9: 65-88.
Jerolmack, Colin and Shamus Khan. 2014. “Talk is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy.” Sociological Methods and Research 43 (2): 178-209.
DiMaggio, Paul. 2014. “Comment on Jerolmack and Khan.” Sociological Methods and Research 43 (2): 232-235.
Lamont, Michèle and Ann Swidler. 2014. “Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing.” Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 153-171.
10. 質化資料分析
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications. Chapters 3 and 4.
Emerson, Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chapter 6
Warren, Carol A. B. and Tracy X. Karner. 2005. “Analyzing Qualitative Data: Fieldnotes, Interview Transcripts, Images, and Documents.” Chapter 9 in Discovering Qualitative Methods. Roxbury Publishing.
11. 民族誌的寫作與倫理
麗絲．高夫曼著，李宗義, 許雅淑譯，2018，全員在逃：一部關於美國黑人城市逃亡生活的民族誌，台北：衛城
12. 歷史檔案分析
Hill, M. R. 1993. Archival strategies and techniques (Vol. 31). Sage Publications.
Mariampolski, Hyman and Dana C. Hughes. 1978. “The Use of Personal Documents in Historical Sociology.” American Sociologist 13(2): 104-113.
Milligan, John D. 1979. “The Treatment of an Historical Source.” History and Theory 18(2): 177-196.
13. 鉅視比較研究
Skocpol, Theda, 劉北成譯，1998[1979]，《國家與社會革命》，頁37-225台北：桂冠
Kiser, Edgar and Michael Hechter. 1991. "The Role of General Theory in Comparative-Historical Sociology " American Journal of Sociology 97:1-30
Goldstone, Jack A. 1997. "Methodological Issues in Comparative Macrosociology." Comparative Sociology Research 16:107-120.
14. 過程論與歷史社會學的轉向
林國明，2012，歷史研究方法，瞿海源等編，社會科學研究方法，東華書局
林國明，2003, 到國家主義之路：路徑依賴與全民健保組織體制的形成，台灣社會學，5:1-71
Calhoun, Craig. 1998. “Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 846-71.
Clemens, Elisabeth S. 2007. “Toward a Historicized Sociology: Theorizing Events, Processes, and Emergence.” Annual Review of Sociology 33:527-49.
15. 歷史敘事分析
馬克思，1972，路易波拿巴的霧月十八日，於《馬克思恩格斯選集》，第一卷，603-703，北京：人民出版社
蕭阿勤，2012，〈敘事分析〉，瞿海源等編，《社會及行為科學研究法》，東華
柯志明，2012，〈跨學科的歷史研究〉，瞿海源等編，《社會及行為科學研究法》，東華
|
|
參考書目 |
待補 |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
2/20 |
社會學方法的多重典範
|
|
第2週 |
2/27 |
多元方法的結合 |
|
第3週 |
3/06 |
研究問題
|
|
第4週 |
3/13 |
文獻回顧
|
|
第5週 |
3/20 |
概念與測量 |
|
第6週 |
3/27 |
因果關係與因果機制
|
|
第7週 |
4/03 |
概念與測量
|
|
第8週 |
4/10 |
抽樣與個案選擇 |
|
第9週 |
4/17 |
訪談
|
|
第10週 |
4/24 |
描述與詮釋 |
|
第11週 |
5/01 |
質化資料分析 |
|
第12週 |
5/08 |
參與觀察與田野關係 |
|
第13週 |
5/15 |
民族誌的寫作與倫理 |
|
第14週 |
5/22 |
過程論與歷史社會學的典範轉移 |
|
第15週 |
5/29 |
歷史敘事分析
|
|
第16週 |
6/05 |
歷史社會學的多重取徑 |
|
第17週 |
6/12 |
敘事與鉅視比較的結合
|
|